In doing so, the Minister of Transport was much more accurate in predicting the scale of the opposition against the Prime Minister’s leadership from the whips of the Conservatives. The background curators were taken by surprise by the magnitude of the insurgency, as they underestimated the number of the parliamentary party that backed the no-confidence motion earlier this month. At the event, Conservative MPs voted 211 to 148 in favor of Mr. Johnson, but the scale of the opposition was larger than that observed in 2018 when Theresa May faced a vote of confidence. It secured the support of 63% of its MPs but was again forced to leave within six months. Johnson saw 41% of his MPs vote against him, a result worse than Mrs May. While the Tories leader and his supporters insist it was a “decisive” victory, it left him bruised amid the partygate scandal, cost of living crisis, political challenges and the threat of further blows in two key by-elections. at Wakefield and Tiverton and Honiton on June 23. Mr Saps had previously predicted the number of Conservative MPs backing Boris Johnson as leader. Asked by Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday if he was “back in the money” after the recent no-confidence vote, Mr Saps said: “One out.” Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:41 The moment the result of the PM vote was announced He added: “But I must point out, it is not as useful as it sounds, it is not as good as it sounds, it is a statistical prediction and not people who voted specifically in one way or another.” However, he will not pull it off when he is pressured to warn Mr Johnson in advance, although as a key ally he may have pointed out the numbers. Mr Saps told Ridge: “I am not going to go into specific details of the debate.” Seeking to draw a line under the recent internal strife, he added: “Everyone is now in the mood to give the prime minister the opportunity, the space, the time to make sure he can continue with some of the work he is doing. . “ Subscribe to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker Former Johnson’s anti-corruption champion John Penrose, who stepped down after accusing the prime minister of violating ministerial rules on Downing Street parties that are destroying the lockdown, said the result of the vote of no confidence leader of the Tories time for “reset”. The Tory MP told Ridge: “I think by winning the vote, although I think he would have liked to have won it much more easily and by a wide margin, but I think the prime minister has gained some time. “And people like me and others, we have to respect the result of this vote, we have to accept and respect it and I think everyone does. “This means that the prime minister has little time to deliver the restoration he has already said he wants to do. “He knows he has to rebuild some bridges if you want, so he says he wants to do it and I think that’s absolutely right for him.” He added: “But I do not think that rebuilding bridges will simply mean ignoring the issue because I do not think ethics work that way. “I do not think that is the way integrity works. “I think you have to show that you are changing what you are doing and changing the way you do it to address the concerns. “You can not just ignore them and pretend it did not happen.”


title: “Vote Of Confidence Boris Johnson Sap Is One Out For The Magnitude Of The Tories Rebellion That Struck The Conservatives Whipped Political News " ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-07” author: “Francesca Mack”


In doing so, the Minister of Transport was much more accurate in predicting the scale of the opposition against the Prime Minister’s leadership from the whips of the Conservatives. The background curators were taken by surprise by the magnitude of the insurgency, as they underestimated the number of the parliamentary party that backed the no-confidence motion earlier this month. At the event, Conservative MPs voted 211 to 148 in favor of Mr. Johnson, but the scale of the opposition was larger than that observed in 2018 when Theresa May faced a vote of confidence. It secured the support of 63% of its MPs but was again forced to leave within six months. Johnson saw 41% of his MPs vote against him, a result worse than Mrs May. While the Tories leader and his supporters insist it was a “decisive” victory, it left him bruised amid the partygate scandal, cost of living crisis, political challenges and the threat of further blows in two key by-elections. at Wakefield and Tiverton and Honiton on June 23. Mr Saps had previously predicted the number of Conservative MPs backing Boris Johnson as leader. Asked by Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday if he was “back in the money” after the recent no-confidence vote, Mr Saps said: “One out.” Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:41 The moment the result of the PM vote was announced He added: “But I must point out, it is not as useful as it sounds, it is not as good as it sounds, it is a statistical prediction and not people who voted specifically in one way or another.” However, he will not pull it off when he is pressured to warn Mr Johnson in advance, although as a key ally he may have pointed out the numbers. Mr Saps told Ridge: “I am not going to go into specific details of the debate.” Seeking to draw a line under the recent internal strife, he added: “Everyone is now in the mood to give the prime minister the opportunity, the space, the time to make sure he can continue with some of the work he is doing. . “ Subscribe to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker Former Johnson’s anti-corruption champion John Penrose, who stepped down after accusing the prime minister of violating ministerial rules on Downing Street parties that are destroying the lockdown, said the result of the vote of no confidence leader of the Tories time for “reset”. The Tory MP told Ridge: “I think by winning the vote, although I think he would have liked to have won it much more easily and by a wide margin, but I think the prime minister has gained some time. “And people like me and others, we have to respect the result of this vote, we have to accept and respect it and I think everyone does. “This means that the prime minister has little time to deliver the restoration he has already said he wants to do. “He knows he has to rebuild some bridges if you want, so he says he wants to do it and I think that’s absolutely right for him.” He added: “But I do not think that rebuilding bridges will simply mean ignoring the issue because I do not think ethics work that way. “I do not think that is the way integrity works. “I think you have to show that you are changing what you are doing and changing the way you do it to address the concerns. “You can not just ignore them and pretend it did not happen.”