Participation Of Players Was Not Mandatory In The Investigation Of Sexual Assault In Hockey Canada

If you or someone you know needs support, those in Canada can find provincial centers, crisis lines and services here. For readers in America, a list of resources and references for survivors and loved ones can be found here. OTAWA – Canadian hockey officials testified before the Heritage Commission on Monday that none of the players in the 2018 World Junior Team involved in the alleged sexual assault of a woman by eight CHL players were coerced by the agency – or the agency . Henein Hutchison LLP, investigating the matter on behalf of Hockey Canada – to participate in the investigation. The commission also heard that Hockey Canada had recently considered two other allegations of assault and had one to two such reports a year for the past five to six years. “I’m going to tell you that one (attack case) in the last five to six years – not one to two every year, one in the last five to six years – is too much,” said Canada Hockey President Scott Smith. And that’s why we’re changing the culture in this game. ” Anthony Housefather, a Liberal MP representing Montreal’s Mont Royal rider, felt that Canada Hockey’s poor attempt to identify the eight players – named John Does 1-8 in the statement of claim – was “worrying” and was further frustrated by the lack of action since Hockey Canada learned of the incident in 2018. “Especially since when I asked them, they agreed on behalf of the perpetrators and paid a settlement on behalf of these eight unknown players,” Housefather told Sportsnet after the meeting. “There were only 19 players. Not to have really done more to find out who the eight were for whom they had to settle a case, and who are potential perpetrators of crime and that they are still playing, perhaps, NHL hockey. That surprises me.” . Outgoing Hockey Canada CEO Tom Renee said during the first hearing that four to six players had taken part in the poll, prompting sharp questions from lawmakers, but Hockey Canada President Scott Smith later corrected it. the number to say it was more accurate to say. four to six players did not participate in the survey. The panel also heard that Hockey Canada suspended its own investigation into the incident in September 2020, a year and a half after learning that the London Police Department was no longer investigating it, citing the plaintiff’s wish not to participate in its investigation. Renney and Smith repeatedly spoke of the organization’s “journey” to improve the hockey culture in the country, but Housefather and other committee members repeatedly asked to see concrete steps in that direction. “If they felt they did not have the legal right to force players to participate in these interviews, why did they not change their contract next year?” said the Member after the committee meeting. “Why didn’t they immediately force all future Canadian teams (players) to participate in this kind of interview? And they still haven’t. It hasn’t changed the process yet, and it’s four years later. That was also worrying.” The Federal Heritage Committee of Canada has invited four Hockey Canada officials to appear in Ottawa for questioning: President and CEO of Hockey Canada Smith, outgoing CEO Renney, former President Andrew Glen McCurdie. McCardy did not attend due to the death of his father. Also present was Andrew Winton, a Canadian hockey lawyer. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and deputy commissioner Bill Daly said ahead of last week’s Stanley Cup Final 1 match that the league, in collaboration with the NHLPA, was investigating the incident. “I hope, as others have said, that the NHL is not the answer here,” Housefather said. “And Hockey Canada will be ashamed because the NHL was able to do the right research … I think we in this country deserve Hockey Canada to do better research.” Renney has served as CEO of Hockey Canada since his appointment in 2014. At the time, he was also appointed President, but resigned from that role in 2017 while remaining as CEO. On April 20, Renney announced that he was retiring from Hockey Canada on July 1, with Smith taking over. Smith was appointed COO in 2007 and took over the role of Renney as president when Renney resigned in 2017. Renney said his resignation was scheduled for April 2021. The Minister of Sports of Canada, Honorary. Pascale St-Onge earlier this month called for a forensic examination of Canadian hockey to see if taxpayers’ money was used in the settlement. St-Onge and Isabelle Mondou, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Canadian Heritage, also testified before the committee. Hockey Canada had previously stated in a statement and reiterated before the committee that “no state funds were used in the recent settlement of the lawsuit”. Parliament is scheduled to adjourn for the summer on Thursday. The Heritage Committee has scheduled another meeting for this meeting on Wednesday. According to the Hockey Canada 2020-21 annual report, state aid accounts for 6% of the agency’s annual funding. The CBC reported Monday that Hockey Canada received $ 14 million in federal funding in 2020 and ’21. On April 20, a woman filed a lawsuit against Hockey Canada, the Canadian Hockey League and eight CHL players in Ontario Superior Court in London, Ont. In it, the woman says she was sexually assaulted by eight CHL players – including some members of the Canadian Junior World Championships 2017-18 team – in a hotel room in London following an Hockey Canada Foundation event in June 2018. The woman chose to do not reveal her identity, nor the identities of the eight players – they are referred to in the lawsuit as John Does 1-8. The lawsuit was settled out of court in May, and the case has not been heard in court. The terms of the settlement have not been made public.

title: “Participation Of Players Was Not Mandatory In The Investigation Of Sexual Assault In Hockey Canada " ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-22” author: “Shirley Gomez”

If you or someone you know needs support, those in Canada can find provincial centers, crisis lines and services here. For readers in America, a list of resources and references for survivors and loved ones can be found here. OTAWA – Canadian hockey officials testified before the Heritage Commission on Monday that none of the players in the 2018 World Junior Team involved in the alleged sexual assault of a woman by eight CHL players were coerced by the agency – or the agency . Henein Hutchison LLP, investigating the matter on behalf of Hockey Canada – to participate in the investigation. The commission also heard that Hockey Canada had recently considered two other allegations of assault and had one to two such reports a year for the past five to six years. “I’m going to tell you that one (attack case) in the last five to six years – not one to two every year, one in the last five to six years – is too much,” said Canada Hockey President Scott Smith. And that’s why we’re changing the culture in this game. ” Anthony Housefather, a Liberal MP representing Montreal’s Mont Royal rider, felt that Canada Hockey’s poor attempt to identify the eight players – named John Does 1-8 in the statement of claim – was “worrying” and was further frustrated by the lack of action since Hockey Canada learned of the incident in 2018. “Especially since when I asked them, they agreed on behalf of the perpetrators and paid a settlement on behalf of these eight unknown players,” Housefather told Sportsnet after the meeting. “There were only 19 players. Not to have really done more to find out who the eight were for whom they had to settle a case, and who are potential perpetrators of crime and that they are still playing, perhaps, NHL hockey. That surprises me.” . Outgoing Hockey Canada CEO Tom Renee said during the first hearing that four to six players had taken part in the poll, prompting sharp questions from lawmakers, but Hockey Canada President Scott Smith later corrected it. the number to say it was more accurate to say. four to six players did not participate in the survey. The panel also heard that Hockey Canada suspended its own investigation into the incident in September 2020, a year and a half after learning that the London Police Department was no longer investigating it, citing the plaintiff’s wish not to participate in its investigation. Renney and Smith repeatedly spoke of the organization’s “journey” to improve the hockey culture in the country, but Housefather and other committee members repeatedly asked to see concrete steps in that direction. “If they felt they did not have the legal right to force players to participate in these interviews, why did they not change their contract next year?” said the Member after the committee meeting. “Why didn’t they immediately force all future Canadian teams (players) to participate in this kind of interview? And they still haven’t. It hasn’t changed the process yet, and it’s four years later. That was also worrying.” The Federal Heritage Committee of Canada has invited four Hockey Canada officials to appear in Ottawa for questioning: President and CEO of Hockey Canada Smith, outgoing CEO Renney, former President Andrew Glen McCurdie. McCardy did not attend due to the death of his father. Also present was Andrew Winton, a Canadian hockey lawyer. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and deputy commissioner Bill Daly said ahead of last week’s Stanley Cup Final 1 match that the league, in collaboration with the NHLPA, was investigating the incident. “I hope, as others have said, that the NHL is not the answer here,” Housefather said. “And Hockey Canada will be ashamed because the NHL was able to do the right research … I think we in this country deserve Hockey Canada to do better research.” Renney has served as CEO of Hockey Canada since his appointment in 2014. At the time, he was also appointed President, but resigned from that role in 2017 while remaining as CEO. On April 20, Renney announced that he was retiring from Hockey Canada on July 1, with Smith taking over. Smith was appointed COO in 2007 and took over the role of Renney as president when Renney resigned in 2017. Renney said his resignation was scheduled for April 2021. The Minister of Sports of Canada, Honorary. Pascale St-Onge earlier this month called for a forensic examination of Canadian hockey to see if taxpayers’ money was used in the settlement. St-Onge and Isabelle Mondou, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Canadian Heritage, also testified before the committee. Hockey Canada had previously stated in a statement and reiterated before the committee that “no state funds were used in the recent settlement of the lawsuit”. Parliament is scheduled to adjourn for the summer on Thursday. The Heritage Committee has scheduled another meeting for this meeting on Wednesday. According to the Hockey Canada 2020-21 annual report, state aid accounts for 6% of the agency’s annual funding. The CBC reported Monday that Hockey Canada received $ 14 million in federal funding in 2020 and ’21. On April 20, a woman filed a lawsuit against Hockey Canada, the Canadian Hockey League and eight CHL players in Ontario Superior Court in London, Ont. In it, the woman says she was sexually assaulted by eight CHL players – including some members of the Canadian Junior World Championships 2017-18 team – in a hotel room in London following an Hockey Canada Foundation event in June 2018. The woman chose to do not reveal her identity, nor the identities of the eight players – they are referred to in the lawsuit as John Does 1-8. The lawsuit was settled out of court in May, and the case has not been heard in court. The terms of the settlement have not been made public.